Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Kristin Branson ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 20d ago
AI ML naming nomenclature essay

From AI to ML to AI: On Swirling Nomenclature & Slurried Thought

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Kristin Branson

“"...the easiest way to indicate novelty in the popular discourse is by changing the name of the field itself!" www.approximatelycorrect.com/2018/06/05/a...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Mark Riedl: Hi. I work on Artificial Intelligence, which the Department of Defense, which calls itself the Department of War, calls Super Intelligence.
Kristin Branson : "...the easiest way to indicate novelty in the popular discourse is by changing the name of the field itself!" www.approximatelycorrect.com/2018/06/05/a...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source approximatelycorrect.com ↗