Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Lauren Klein ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 8 posts · 14d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“.. the humanistic—and more specifically linguistic and literary theoretical—interpretation into computer scientific notion of AI (mechanistic) interpretability. As I like to think, we are going to …” evidence ↗
Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal: .. the humanistic—and more specifically linguistic and literary theoretical—interpretation into computer scientific notion of AI (mechanistic) interpretability. As I like to think, we are going to …
Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal: ... Along with Ryan Healey and Pierre Depaz and a Computer Science postdoc (to be hired, let me know if you know excellent candidates), we at contralab (plus our partner Gianni Gastaldi at ETH Züri…
Open the thread →