Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Questions & unknowns Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Companies rushed in on AI. Now some are pulling back Questions & unknowns · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Lauren Klein ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI business Development 2d ago
⚡ 7 h early
companies pull back from AI rush

Companies rushed in on AI. Now some are pulling back

12 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Social Media Lab
“You could 've asked any experienced information system/tech researchers, & we could have told you what would happen. ”Companies rushed in on AI. Now some are pulling back. Rapid AI adoption left workers cleaning up a flood of errors and low-quality work." w…” evidence ↗
12 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Lauren Klein Olivia Guest Luke Stark Rachel Coldicutt Marielza Erin Kissane Eileen Clancy 🧿 Daniel Solove +4
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Questions & unknowns

2 experts

What remains unresolved or contested.

“I am sorry, which company is this? www.theguardian.com/technology/2...”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Microsoft found that “adding agents to a broken process still leaves a broken process” and “speeding up one step just creates a longer queue at the next” www.theguardian.com/technology/2...”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“You could 've asked any experienced information system/tech researchers, & we could have told you what would happen. ”Companies rushed in on AI. Now some are pulling back. Rapid AI adoption left workers cleaning up a flood of errors and low-quality work." w…”

Primary source theguardian.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 8 posts · 14d ago
Lauren Klein Fabian Offert Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal
Matches Research & technical analysis
“.. the humanistic—and more specifically linguistic and literary theoretical—interpretation into computer scientific notion of AI (mechanistic) interpretability. As I like to think, we are going to …” evidence ↗
Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal: .. the humanistic—and more specifically linguistic and literary theoretical—interpretation into computer scientific notion of AI (mechanistic) interpretability. As I like to think, we are going to …
Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal: ... Along with Ryan Healey and Pierre Depaz and a Computer Science postdoc (to be hired, let me know if you know excellent candidates), we at contralab (plus our partner Gianni Gastaldi at ETH Züri…
Open the thread →