Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,261 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Lior (AlphaSignal) ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Release 12d ago
⚡ 20 h early
Anthropic Claude Science workbench launch

Claude Science, an AI workbench for scientists

6 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

6 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“GeneBench-Pro: https://t.co/Qdj6oGuSAQ Claude Science: https://t.co/ztoVy8bqoY PAT paper: https://t.co/rHBE6uFM7x Check out https://t.co/8BDzBaqgEp to get a daily summary of the latest breakthrough news, models, papers and repos. Read by 300,000+ devs”

Established Compute & infrastructure Signal 4d ago

Open Models as AI Incident Response Infrastructure | AlphaSignal

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“Link: https://t.co/AdHkyjd5EO Taste answer: when code and logs arrive together, treat Find and Reconstruct as separate checks. Instant empty refusals are a known outcome. If the model describes the attack and never hands you the key, put a decoder script ne…”