Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Resource 6d ago
AI influence level framework v1.0

AI Influence Level (AIL) v1.0

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
“If you're a human, even if you're using AI assistance, you know to snip out the irrelevant bits when copy-pasting. A crawler working a list of 100 leads does not. (ps want to know what an AIL is? check out danielmiessler.com/blog/ai-infl...)” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)

“If you're a human, even if you're using AI assistance, you know to snip out the irrelevant bits when copy-pasting. A crawler working a list of 100 leads does not. (ps want to know what an AIL is? check out danielmiessler.com/blog/ai-infl...)”

Primary source danielmiessler.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 42 posts · 7h ago
Pwnallthethings Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Phillip Carter Doll
Matches Questions & unknowns
“literally these are books that would be pulped if not bought for 10 cents on the dollar. do rare books sometimes make it into there? yeah, if someone is careless, but that's *upstream* of what happ…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): literally these are books that would be pulped if not bought for 10 cents on the dollar. do rare books sometimes make it into there? yeah, if someone is careless, but that's *upstream* of what happ…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I literally worked on Google Books scanops SRE, ama the same guy who ran Google Books now has the equivalent job at Anthropic and I can promise you that all of us handled every library book with th…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 10h ago
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Doll
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Like their business model depends upon cheaply acquiring words, why would they pay a penny more than they had to? Buying a single $100 book, never mind hundreds, blows out your cost per scanned word” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I also worked on Google Book search on the netsec side. Pulping books was for mass market books that you want to scan quickly & cheaply. Anthropic: doing the same thing. It's fine to disagree with …
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): People are conspiracy brain conflating checking out rare library books and scanning them, and destroying mass market books while scanning them. I've even seen assertions Anthropic buys up and destr…
Open the thread →