Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis IdeaLens: Detecting AI Ideas in Long-form Writing Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Marzena Karpinska ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 8d ago
⚡ 174 h early

IdeaLens: Detecting AI Ideas in Long-form Writing

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Marzena Karpinska, Stephen Turner
“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Marzena Karpinska Stephen Turner
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Established AI field signal Resource 15d ago

GitHub - RishanthRajendhran/IdeaLens: Detect whether a document's ideas came from a person or an AI model: the idealens Python package

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Marzena Karpinska
“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Marzena Karpinska

“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.”

Primary source github.com ↗
Established AI field signal Resource 15d ago

Client Challenge

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Marzena Karpinska
“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Marzena Karpinska

“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.”

Primary source pypi.org ↗
Established AI field signal Resource 15d ago

IdeaLens - a rishanthrajendhran Collection

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Marzena Karpinska
“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Marzena Karpinska

“and of course you get all the usual: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.06778 Models & Datasets: hf.co/collections/... Github: github.com/RishanthRaje... PyPi: pypi.org/project/idea... + You can test both detectors on Tinker API for as low as $1 for 1K documents.”

Primary source huggingface.co ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 11 posts · 14d ago
Ted Underwood Marzena Karpinska Jenna Russell
Matches Research & technical analysis
“the scary part is it was 200 pages with all extra datasets tested, but then we had to condense it...” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Ted Underwood: This is complex — and likely a bit fragile — but very cool. Actually less interested in the ostensible end goal (Pangram for Ideas) and more in the problems you have to solve to get there (separati…
Ted Underwood: There's some crazy stuff in the ablations. The order of elements has almost no significance. The "discourse roles" they infer? Not load-bearing. You can remove them. On the other hand, it's possibl…
Open the thread →