Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,365 searchable experts 2,967 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Marzena Karpinska ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 10 posts · 13d ago
Maria Antoniak Thomas Dietterich Marzena Karpinska Christian Wolf Marco Z Arseny Khakhalin
Maria Antoniak: hot take: don’t even use it for polishing your reviews. as an AC and SAC, the last thing i care about is your grammar, spelling, or formatting. i get the presentation issues with papers, where you …
Marzena Karpinska: funniest part is that the one i saw looked like bullet points copy-pasted from whichever-ai-tool. there was no space precisely where the bullet points changed but the person said they used ai proof…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 7 posts · 16d ago
Maria Antoniak Ted Underwood Marzena Karpinska
Ted Underwood: People are being polite, but what's happened is a flood of people from neighboring fields starting to perceive ACL venues as the highest-value place to publish their interdisciplinary work. As part…
Marzena Karpinska: Yes, the current solution is to require at least 1 author per paper to contribute (either as a reviewer, AC, or SAC). This means that if no authors are qualified, you can't submit. A bit hard to ba…
Open the thread →