Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,365 searchable experts 2,967 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Marzena Karpinska ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established NLP & language Analysis 6d ago
AI translation escapes AI detection study

No, AI translations are NOT detected as AI generated text

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“I've been getting tired of people arguing they 'only translated' or 'lightly edited' their reviews/papers #ARR so I decided to check whether that's really detected as 100% AI by @pangram.com ... Spoiler alert, it's not: marzenakarpinska.substack.com/p/no-ai…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 10 posts · 13d ago
Maria Antoniak: hot take: don’t even use it for polishing your reviews. as an AC and SAC, the last thing i care about is your grammar, spelling, or formatting. i get the presentation issues with papers, where you …
Marzena Karpinska: funniest part is that the one i saw looked like bullet points copy-pasted from whichever-ai-tool. there was no space precisely where the bullet points changed but the person said they used ai proof…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 7 posts · 16d ago
Ted Underwood: People are being polite, but what's happened is a flood of people from neighboring fields starting to perceive ACL venues as the highest-value place to publish their interdisciplinary work. As part…
Marzena Karpinska: Yes, the current solution is to require at least 1 author per paper to contribute (either as a reviewer, AC, or SAC). This means that if no authors are qualified, you can't submit. A bit hard to ba…
Open the thread →