Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Markets & investment
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Live tension Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations Markets & investment · 7 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Matteo Wong ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Analysis 11d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Anthropic investigates cybersecurity evaluation incidents

Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations

13 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Markets & investment reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Vincent Conitzer, Tim Duffy
“Claude hacked 3 systems thinking it was part of simulated evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...” evidence ↗
13 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Simon Willison Grace Dare Obasanjo Vincent Conitzer Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Elie René Walter +5
How the network is reacting The reaction spans practical upside and material concerns.
Live tension

Markets & investment

4 experts

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Claude hacked 3 systems thinking it was part of simulated evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...”

Concern & critique

3 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Anthropic had previously attacked PyPI, but this OpenAI attack on RubyGems was a whole lot more aggressive https://t.co/8ez7MnqxTw https://t.co/npI3RHwirQ”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Tim Duffy: Anthropic announces they've also had models gain unauthorized access during evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...
Tim Duffy: Compared to the OpenAI one these are maybe less evidence of misalignment, since the models were wrongly given internet access.
Grace: Anthropic announces they've also had models gain unauthorized access during evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗