Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by MeasuringU ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Analysis 18d ago
AI UI testing hallucinations study

Does AI Find Real UI Problems or Just Hallucinations? – MeasuringU

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“AI products like ChatGPT and Gemini can add value to #UX reviews of videos from usability tests, but they are more like junior researchers, whose actions and conclusions require expert human oversight. https://t.co/PGYPRhpN9n https://t.co/0aHJNk5eYR”

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Resource 18d ago
AI UX measurement guide

Streamlined Measurement of the UX of AI – MeasuringU

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“Using new short questionnaires for assessing the #UX of AI of four generative AI chatbots, we found Grok users had the lowest ratings of AI Anxiety and highest ratings of AI Personification. https://t.co/vBqzOPUoC0 https://t.co/a3LZTdJS8c”