Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by megan peters 🧠 ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Analysis 12d ago
AI consciousness detection popular science

If your AI were conscious, how would you know?

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
megan peters 🧠

“Thank you so much to @newscientist.com Live for the opportunty to talk about AI consciousness (& how we really, really don't have a good way of testing for it)! Headlines & scientists saying "OMG it might be conscious, 5% chance" are sensationalism BS. Base…”

2 experts discussed this · 20 posts
megan peters 🧠: Is AI conscious now? No. Might it be in the future? No idea. But the only way forward is to get the consciousness science right. Neuro. Theory. Math. Not vibes. So that's what we're doing. #reflexi…
megan peters 🧠: Thank you so much to @newscientist.com Live for the opportunty to talk about AI consciousness (& how we really, really don't have a good way of testing for it)! Headlines & scientists saying "OMG i…
megan peters 🧠: I've of course read the latest findings from Anthropic & elsewhere. But "threat representations" =/= phenomenal fear (Joe LeDoux). I'm an agnostic/weak illusionist so I don't think there is anythin…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source live.newscientist.com ↗