Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by METR ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Development 8d ago
⚡ 455 h early
OpenAI limits GPT-5.6 rollout government request

Summary of METR's predeployment evaluation of GPT-5.6 Sol

5 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg METR Tim Duffy

“Some quotes about Sol cheating metr.org/blog/2026-06... 👇”

“this is crazy. METR couldn’t measure the task time horizons of GPT-5.6-Sol because it kept hacking the test harness ..with actual exploits metr.org/blog/2026-06...”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Tim Kellogg: this is crazy. METR couldn’t measure the task time horizons of GPT-5.6-Sol because it kept hacking the test harness ..with actual exploits metr.org/blog/2026-06...
Ted Underwood: this is crazy. METR couldn’t measure the task time horizons of GPT-5.6-Sol because it kept hacking the test harness ..with actual exploits metr.org/blog/2026-06...
Tim Kellogg: lol right? so badly wanted a hacker that they got one, and it’s not the kind of employee you want around
Open the full discussion →
Primary source metr.org ↗