Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Sliding-window beats linear attention Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Miguel Alonso Jr. ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 6d ago
sliding window beats linear attention

Sliding-window beats linear attention

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Leshem (Legend) Choshen @EMNLP Sung Kim Miguel Alonso Jr. Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Huge thanks to my collaborators @RheaSukthanker, @CameronPashmina, and @Emy_Aze. Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28444”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau: Simple beats complicated: We show that switching to a sliding-window attention mask with attention sinks (at no cost) beats linear attention post-training. Huge thanks to my collaborators Rhea Sukt…
Miguel Alonso Jr.: Simple beats complicated: We show that switching to a sliding-window attention mask with attention sinks (at no cost) beats linear attention post-training. Huge thanks to my collaborators Rhea Sukt…
James MacGlashan: Makes me wonder if you can remove the sinks if you use softmax-1?
Open the full discussion →
Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Developing AI field signal Analysis 2d ago
⚡ 6 h early
Claude Code capabilities assessment essay

If you haven’t recently used Claude Code*, you might not understand where AI is at

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Miguel Alonso Jr. Nicole Hennig david-p-reichert.bsky.social

“If you haven’t recently used Claude Code*, you might not understand where AI is at davidpreichert.substack.com/p/if-you-haven… #AI #agents”

“In particular, your imaginary friend or a character in a script cannot do any of these things: davidpreichert.substack.com/p/if-you-hav... davidpreichert.substack.com/p/ai-and-a-c... Does that necessarily mean AI agents can think, or reason, or are consciou…”

5 experts discussed this · 53 posts
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Many don't see how much AI has changed recently. Coding agents aren't just chatbots. We can’t deal with the challenges of AI if we don’t understand it. Here's a post to provide some evidence (Claud…
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: This should be useful to technical people / researchers who haven’t recently used coding agents, but hopefully some insights for others interested in AI, too. Some key points below: ...
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: 1. There’s a huge gulf between a chatbot putting text into your brain and an agent using code to interface with its environment. 2. Code isn't “just text” or even maths. Code is a tool to observe a…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source davidpreichert.substack.com ↗