Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by rat king 🐀 👑 ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Safety & security Analysis 11h ago
Tao AI math misalignment essay

A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Nathan Lambert, Justin Hendrix
“A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transition the fastest, so it was felt most. Other fields next. terr…” evidence ↗
11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Melanie Mitchell Nathan Lambert Eugene Vinitsky Meredith Broussard Justin Hendrix rat king 🐀 👑 Robin Hanson Dare Obasanjo +3
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“"...the push by AI companies to solve mathematical problems as a benchmark is detrimental to the science of mathematics, and to the mathematical community."”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If rewarding AI mathematicians by the same metric that we have rewarded humans ones make math go badly, then we are probably rewarding the human ones badly. With good reward metrics, we shouldn't care who wins them. https://t.co/CO6Z9o3mcW”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Nathan Lambert: A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transiti…
Melanie Mitchell: A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transiti…
Jonathan Stray: There are concerns in here I share but I can’t endorse this. This satirical response kinda sums it up “A Severe Misalignment of AI and Cancer Biology” x.com/mbeisen/stat...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source terrytao.wordpress.com ↗