Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Miles Brundage ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 8h ago

arxiv.org

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Miles Brundage

“Just thinking about how, when my coauthors and I published "The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence," some people were annoyed by us talking about sci-fi scenarios like automated hacking and spear phishing, lethal autonomous drones, etc. https://t.co/R…”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
New Policy & governance Analysis 8h ago
US frontier AI auditing legislation analysis

Frontier AI Auditing-Related Legislation in the US: Landscape, Challenges, and a Path Forward — AVERI

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Miles Brundage

“@nikunj @Privahini @AVERIorg Not every model for sure. Here are some general principles - https://t.co/8XdMOnWvZY Subsequently there have been some further developments like the introduction of the FRONTIER Act, the passage of SB 315 in Illinois... in each …”

Primary source averi.org ↗