Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Christopher Mims ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 5 posts · 11d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“In theory that's what the frontiers are for: make cheaper big innovations that other people turn into practical, even cheaper applications (similar dynamics in electrification and machine tooling l…” evidence ↗
Dan Greene : This is basically the Jeff Ding case: real, pervasive adoption depends on end-users taking cheaper tools and figuring out profitable use cases in their specific domains. Which is not the moonshot/A…
Dan Greene : I feel like that's a timing issue. There's a world where OAI shrinks and gets fully acquired by Microsoft, Anthropic IPOs, and the action shifts to applications that use MS or Anthropic or whatever…
Open the thread →