Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Meredith Martin ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 12d ago
⚡ 193 h early
math and AI declaration

Declaration — Math and AI

20 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Michelle Greene
“I think you’re right about the goal. I question whether it’s a good goal. I think a lot about overly-automated science. Too many papers that too few people read, and a loss of science as a process rather than a series of outcomes. I agree with the Field med…” evidence ↗
20 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Richard Sutton Emad Gary Marcus Marc Lanctot Juan Diego Rodriguez Olivia Guest J. Nathan Matias Delip Rao e/σ +12

“I think you’re right about the goal. I question whether it’s a good goal. I think a lot about overly-automated science. Too many papers that too few people read, and a loss of science as a process rather than a series of outcomes. I agree with the Field med…”

“A nice statement from the mathematicians: https://t.co/KGNvPnjEdi”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Michelle Greene: I cannot. Can we really not be bothered to read and write?
Michelle Greene: This! 100% this! Why are we academics except to over-read, over-write, and over-think?
Michelle Greene: …sigh…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source mathandai.org ↗
Established AI research Analysis 16d ago
⚡ 345 h early
Leiden Declaration AI and mathematics

Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics

16 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Clément Canonne
“A list of principles put forth by mathematicians, for mathematicians and other researchers, regarding the use of AI in research. "Number #9 will surprise you!" leidendeclaration.ai” evidence ↗
16 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Emily M. Bender Timnit Gebru joao Clément Canonne Olivia Guest suhr Pierre Alquier Lisa Messeri +8
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“A list of principles put forth by mathematicians, for mathematicians and other researchers, regarding the use of AI in research. "Number #9 will surprise you!" leidendeclaration.ai”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“Andrew, here is a place to start for some background reading: leidendeclaration.ai >>”

4 experts discussed this · 22 posts
Emily M. Bender: Between the PRs of (largely likely stolen) math breakthroughs, claims of "rogue AI" (actually cybercrimes by companies, but whatevs), and doomerist "whistleblowers", it feels like we've been subjec…
Emily M. Bender: And people have the gall to refer to all of this as "new empiral evidence" (of "AI" or "AGI" or something) and demand that we respond to it. >>
Emily M. Bender: But it doesn't matter how verifiable the math results are, nor how diligently the media repeats the anthropomorphized descriptions of the cybercrimes and breathless repetitions of existential risk …
Open the full discussion →
Primary source leidendeclaration.ai ↗
Established Evaluation & benchmarks Research 7d ago
⚡ 6 h early
human authorship halo attribution paper

The human-authorship halo: attribution bias in literary style evaluation by humans and AI

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Meredith Martin
“arxiv.org/abs/2510.08831 updated version of our article from last year @wouterhaverals.bsky.social and I updated the title & experiments. Check out this strengthened version, esp. if you are thinking abt cultural evaluation & benchmarks. @arnicas.bsky.socia…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Maria Antoniak Meredith Martin

“arxiv.org/abs/2510.08831 updated version of our article from last year @wouterhaverals.bsky.social and I updated the title & experiments. Check out this strengthened version, esp. if you are thinking abt cultural evaluation & benchmarks. @arnicas.bsky.socia…”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 10d ago
Meredith Martin Luis Villa Melissa Terras
Matches Research & technical analysis
“My experiments on citation-checking of Wikipedia citations are constantly stymied by this. It’s much more widespread than I could have imagined.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Melissa Terras: Of all the ways I imagined Google Scholar going up in flames, being made inaccessible from university IP addresses due to AI-driven scraping wasn't at the top of my list.
Meredith Martin: I lurk on code4lib too much it’s a 5 alarm fire!
Open the thread →