Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Meredith Rose ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 10d ago
⚡ 2343 h early

No ai is not stochastic parrot a99e57766bed

6 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Will Oremus
“I reposted this, but tacking itonto this thread as well bc I think it's useful context. Margaret was also a co-author of the Stochastic Parrots paper and recently offered some thoughts on which parts of the analogy hold up (and which have been widely misund…” evidence ↗
6 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
17 experts discussed this · 104 posts
Will Oremus: feels like there is a group of smart and well-intentioned people who long ago made up their minds that AI Is Bad, swore off using it, and now get all their info about AI from each other. not saying…
Will Oremus: you can eschew anthropomorphizing language like "think" and "reason" and even "intelligence" but anyone who uses these tools regularly cannot fail to see that what they do is something more than ju…
Will Oremus: or if it is parroting, it's stretching the bounds of your conventional understanding of that term so far as to render it misleading. parrots cannot solve complex problems, self-interrogate and self…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 25 posts · 14d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Refusal is a half measure.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Bisexual of the Blade (Alt-text or DIE): Meredith is right here. Refusing to use the tech won’t make it go away, concerted opposition will. This shit won’t go away unless we make it go away.
Meredith Rose: Here's the thing, though: it won't. The technology itself exists, it's open source, and it's widely distributed. What you can do is mitigate harms, which include things like responsible adoption (o…
Open the thread →