Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Martin Tutek ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Research 9d ago
⚡ 6 h early
LLM factual error pushback paper

Pushback in a Haystack: Language Models Respond to Factual Errors Ambiguously and Ineffectively

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Lucy Li Martin Tutek

“Models are sycophantic, and when they do challenge faulty or incorrect inputs, they're ambiguous and ineffective. In a new paper w/ a multilingual co-author team, we find that people may view LM responses that push back, yet still end up believing false con…”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗