Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Kimi K3.1 Pro Tech Blog: Advancing Open Intelligence Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦 ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Accelerating AI field signal Signal 4h ago

Kimi K3.1 Pro Tech Blog: Advancing Open Intelligence

6 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Nathan Lambert, Tim Kellogg, Max Woolf
“Kimi K3.1 is announced as 3.1 Pro. The benchmark scores look to be clearly the strongest current open weight model, if the weights are released as they claim by November 4th. They are very impressive scores. www.kimi.ai/blog/kimi-k3...” evidence ↗
6 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Nathan Lambert Ted Underwood Tim Kellogg Max Woolf Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦 jeremymorrell.dev
Primary source kimi.ai ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 21 posts · 1d ago
Eugene Vinitsky Adam Wiemerslage Sam Barrett, PhD Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Lots of new folks trying to write papers so it’s important to know: if there’s a mistake in the paper, the responsibility falls on you. You cannot offload it to the AI assistant.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: It takes so long to write a paper because we are crazy about not making mistakes and checking as many edge cases as we can. This stressful responsibility is, I suppose, not obvious. so, if you’re n…
Eugene Vinitsky: Lots of new folks trying to write papers so it’s important to know: if there’s a mistake in the paper, the responsibility falls on you. You cannot offload it to the AI assistant.
Open the thread →