Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Muse Wonder Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Nathan Lambert ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Development 10d ago
⚡ 2 h early
Meta Muse Wonder model launch

Muse Wonder

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Nathan Lambert, Tim Kellogg, Sung Kim
“Looks like Meta is back at the frontier with their latest "Muse Wonder" models. Will be interesting to see independent evaluations / user testing. research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wo...” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Nathan Lambert Tim Kellogg Chris Paxton Sung Kim
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Looks like Meta is back at the frontier with their latest "Muse Wonder" models. Will be interesting to see independent evaluations / user testing. research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wo...”

2 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Sung Kim: Meta's Muse Wonder Muse Wonder = Muse Wonder Flash Muse Wonder Full = Muse Wonder so confusing... research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wo...
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: All for the pun...
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Not sure how much I'd trust that.. my experience with Spark 1.3 and Spark 1.3 contributor has been... subpar vs. what the benchmarks suggest
Open the full discussion →
Primary source research.meta.ai ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 3 posts · 19d ago
Nathan Lambert Grace
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I think pacing the frontier is good as an idea in principle but dead on arrival as something you can actually do. What will we, decide which benchmarks we can improve on? Who is involved? If we sto…” evidence ↗
Nathan Lambert: I think pacing the frontier is good as an idea in principle but dead on arrival as something you can actually do. What will we, decide which benchmarks we can improve on? Who is involved? If we sto…
Nathan Lambert: It distracts from how so much of AI risks is simply coming from diffusing what we have, and we should invest in preparedness, pushing the labs to be more careful, etc. Change my mind?
Open the thread →