Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Matthew L. Jones ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 9d ago
⚡ 193 h early
math and AI declaration

Declaration — Math and AI

20 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

20 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Richard Sutton Emad Gary Marcus Marc Lanctot Juan Diego Rodriguez Olivia Guest J. Nathan Matias Delip Rao e/σ +12

“A nice statement from the mathematicians: https://t.co/KGNvPnjEdi”

“Ok all, daily blog here it is, the first blog is on the future of Mathematics following the https://t.co/XV2iGEj50R declaration from 25 Field Medallists Let me know if you like it and amplify! Emad the British Mathematician https://t.co/1SzRUnW357 https://t…”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Michelle Greene: I cannot. Can we really not be bothered to read and write?
Michelle Greene: This! 100% this! Why are we academics except to over-read, over-write, and over-think?
Michelle Greene: …sigh…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source mathandai.org ↗