Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by nitasha tiku ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

wapo.st

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Neil Turkewitz
““Predictions of extinction risk from AI are better understood as prophecies rather than quantitative forecasts. They involve critical untestable assumptions about how events will unfold.” Vermeer added “that far-off predictions could reduce willingness to a…” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
nitasha tiku: the illo for my story today on AI extinction risk is art. by Maria Jesus Contreras.
nitasha tiku: here is a gift link wapo.st/4rkNpZo hope you'll give it a read. there's a lot of reporting, color and context. diff approach from the way these issues are covered elsewhere. still could only get in…
Marielza: 😭 that went hard...
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 17 posts · 16d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“I can't believe how many of my normie friends I had to explain superintelligence, AI safety, rationalism and x-risk to today.” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
David Pfau: I can't believe how many of my normie friends I had to explain superintelligence, AI safety, rationalism and x-risk to today.
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Let me guess -- still not convinced by any of those? :)
Open the thread →