Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Nikhil Garg ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI research Research 2d ago
⚡ 59 h early
AI text detection distribution shift paper

Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift

5 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2606.25152 Thread:”

5 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Eugene Vinitsky: Pangram + arxiv is slightly too expensive for my wallet, guess this waits for another day
angela zhou: i think you (or anyone else) may be able to just ask max spero for the credits for research - unfortunately he's very online on x
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them): Pangram + arxiv is slightly too expensive for my wallet, guess this waits for another day
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article