Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Pierre Alquier ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Development 17d ago
⚡ 4 h early
arXiv updates AI rate limit policy

Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Thomas Dietterich, Clément Canonne, Olivia Guest
“Corrected link: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Arxiv is limiting paper submissions to two per **submitter** (not per author) per month. Corrected link from the post below: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Clément Canonne: "We want to encourage authors to be mindful with their work, taking care that they are submitting something substantial of scholarly interest that meets arXiv's guidelines and standards." 2 submiss…
David Picard: Oh, so you just have to let your 5 postdocs and 17 PhD students submit the work of your 35 undergrads to be off the hook and keep your 80+ papers per year? Good to know!
Lana Sinapayen: Pretty sure this is targeting single authors with 12 LLM generated pdfs, not big labs that legitimately can produce more than 2 papers a month.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 9 posts · 19d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Ça fait quelque temps (2/3 ans) que je fais de la modération pour arXiv sur la catégorie stat.ML. L'été a été tranquille comme d'hab mais cette rentrée est y'a effectivement trois fois plus de taff…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
David Picard: Il faut regarder par catégorie. Le gros de l'exp vient de CS.LG, CS.CV et CS.CL c'est à dire l'IA moderne.
David Picard: Ce sont les deadlines des conférences de ML
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 13d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I agree completely. That being said, unfortunately, the research community was not uniformly following this rule, even before the AI era...” evidence ↗
Clément Canonne: "When you prove a theorem, you are imparted a responsibility to the field. At minimum you need to explain what you did, including which steps required new ideas and which steps are already well-kno…
Pierre Alquier: "When you prove a theorem, you are imparted a responsibility to the field. At minimum you need to explain what you did, including which steps required new ideas and which steps are already well-kno…
Open the thread →