Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy Research & technical analysis · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Pierre Alquier ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Development 17d ago
⚡ 4 h early
arXiv updates AI rate limit policy

Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Thomas Dietterich, Clément Canonne, Olivia Guest
“Corrected link: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Thomas Dietterich Clément Canonne Ramon Astudillo Olivia Guest Pierre Alquier Ben Williamson Abdoulaye Diack Zander Furnas +3
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Arxiv is limiting paper submissions to two per **submitter** (not per author) per month. Corrected link from the post below: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Clément Canonne: "We want to encourage authors to be mindful with their work, taking care that they are submitting something substantial of scholarly interest that meets arXiv's guidelines and standards." 2 submiss…
David Picard: Oh, so you just have to let your 5 postdocs and 17 PhD students submit the work of your 35 undergrads to be off the hook and keep your 80+ papers per year? Good to know!
Lana Sinapayen: Pretty sure this is targeting single authors with 12 LLM generated pdfs, not big labs that legitimately can produce more than 2 papers a month.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source blog.arxiv.org ↗
Established AI research Resource 6d ago
ML dynamical systems postdoc posting

Postdoctoral researcher in Machine Learning and Dynamical Systems

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · ELLIS
“🏹 Job alert: Postdoctoral researcher in Machine Learning and Dynamical Systems at Italian Institute of Technology (IIT) 📍 Genoa 🇮🇹 ⏰ 31 October 🔗 https://bit.ly/4B4pfXI” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Pierre Alquier ELLIS Evangelos Kazakos

“🏹 Job alert: Postdoctoral researcher in Machine Learning and Dynamical Systems at Italian Institute of Technology (IIT) 📍 Genoa 🇮🇹 ⏰ 31 October 🔗 https://bit.ly/4B4pfXI”

Primary source app.ncoreplat.com ↗
New AI field signal Signal 17h ago

Minimax estimation of the pseudo-spectral gap of continuous Markov chains, with applications to empirical concentration bounds

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Pierre Alquier
“From my point of view, the objective is close to my previous paper with V. Karagulyan and M. Kasprzak: arxiv.org/abs/2610.20007 we want deviation bounds that can be used to define agnostic learning objectives. What differs here is 1) the class of processes …” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Pierre Alquier

“From my point of view, the objective is close to my previous paper with V. Karagulyan and M. Kasprzak: arxiv.org/abs/2610.20007 we want deviation bounds that can be used to define agnostic learning objectives. What differs here is 1) the class of processes …”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Established AI research Research 16d ago
statistical estimators mutual information convergence paper

Convergence of Statistical Estimators via Mutual Information Bounds

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Pierre Alquier
“We uploaded a new version of our mutual information bound for statistical inference with Mehdi: arxiv.org/abs/2412.18539 There are many new results that were not in the previous version, including extentions to misspecified models, etc.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Pierre Alquier

“We uploaded a new version of our mutual information bound for statistical inference with Mehdi: arxiv.org/abs/2412.18539 There are many new results that were not in the previous version, including extentions to misspecified models, etc.”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 9 posts · 19d ago
Pierre Alquier David Picard
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Ça fait quelque temps (2/3 ans) que je fais de la modération pour arXiv sur la catégorie stat.ML. L'été a été tranquille comme d'hab mais cette rentrée est y'a effectivement trois fois plus de taff…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
David Picard: Il faut regarder par catégorie. Le gros de l'exp vient de CS.LG, CS.CV et CS.CL c'est à dire l'IA moderne.
David Picard: Ce sont les deadlines des conférences de ML
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 13d ago
Clément Canonne Pierre Alquier
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I agree completely. That being said, unfortunately, the research community was not uniformly following this rule, even before the AI era...” evidence ↗
Clément Canonne: "When you prove a theorem, you are imparted a responsibility to the field. At minimum you need to explain what you did, including which steps required new ideas and which steps are already well-kno…
Pierre Alquier: "When you prove a theorem, you are imparted a responsibility to the field. At minimum you need to explain what you did, including which steps required new ideas and which steps are already well-kno…
Open the thread →