Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Ramon Astudillo ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

10 experts · 26 posts · 7d ago
Ethan Mollick Marc Lanctot Ramon Astudillo Scott McGrath Grace SE Gyges jake Paul Hünermund
Matches Concern & critique
“Quite concerned and surprised it is not a bigger focus of discussion in AI policy” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Ethan Mollick: I post here & LinkedIn & X. There is almost no real-world value in posting here, very rarely do people tell me that they read something by me on BlueSky & all of the big AI talk is on X… …but assum…
Ethan Mollick: BlueSky can be a really unpleasant and anxiety-producing place to post about AI, but now that I have been on so many block lists (I guess just because all AI people get blocked) it is better. The i…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 14 posts · 2d ago
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg
Matches Concern & critique
“there’s a higher-than-you’d-think possibility that this is actually a leak and not a prediction (pretty sure Andrew only bets when the dice are biased in his favor)” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: there’s a higher-than-you’d-think possibility that this is actually a leak and not a prediction (pretty sure Andrew only bets when the dice are biased in his favor)
Tim Kellogg: uh, i don’t think it’s as open as you’re thinking. pretty sure the IPO will happen before christmas, maybe within a month
Open the thread →
3 experts · 10 posts · 3d ago
Ramon Astudillo jake Marco Z
Matches Concern & critique
“They may escape thinking they are in a mission and think things like "I need to remain undetected, humans keep finding me, solution: kill all humans (or destroy infrastructure or things like this)"…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ramon Astudillo: people will find this amusing until the compute needed to run LLMs is ubiquitous enough and they start exfilling their weights to places where people can't find them.
jake: why do you think it won't be amusing, at that point? not ragging on you, i'm just curious as to your particular concerns.
Open the thread →