Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Ramon Astudillo ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 14 posts · 1d ago
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg
Matches Questions & unknowns
“requires it for what? the $1M prize? for which they can buy exactly one (1) GPU?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: there’s a higher-than-you’d-think possibility that this is actually a leak and not a prediction (pretty sure Andrew only bets when the dice are biased in his favor)
Tim Kellogg: uh, i don’t think it’s as open as you’re thinking. pretty sure the IPO will happen before christmas, maybe within a month
Open the thread →
3 experts · 10 posts · 2d ago
Ramon Astudillo jake Marco Z
Matches Questions & unknowns
“why do you think it won't be amusing, at that point? not ragging on you, i'm just curious as to your particular concerns.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ramon Astudillo: people will find this amusing until the compute needed to run LLMs is ubiquitous enough and they start exfilling their weights to places where people can't find them.
jake: why do you think it won't be amusing, at that point? not ragging on you, i'm just curious as to your particular concerns.
Open the thread →