Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,378 searchable experts 3,805 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by RAND Corporation ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Analysis 12h ago
AI bioweapons biosecurity warning essay

Newly created viruses are a warning. We still have a window to stop AI-enabled bioweapons

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“"We have a window of opportunity to build the layered system of defense we need now, before AI-enabled bioweapons capabilities become undeniably advanced—or worse, demonstrably effective." https://t.co/UH41Ld2taJ”

Established Safety & security Signal 18d ago

Building a Biosecurity Strategy for the AI Era

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“No single safeguard can prevent a bad actor from using AI to help build a biological weapon. But our new report identifies nine interventions that, layered together, could meaningfully lower the risk of a significant AI-enabled attack. https://t.co/xrAGACJfDY”