Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by RAND Corporation ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 16d ago
⚡ 71 h early

jamanetwork.com

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Of nearly 40,000 Canadian students, more than 1 in 5 use generative AI for emotional support or advice. About 58% of them scored above a clinical threshold for emotional problems vs 29% of non-users.”

“More than 1 in 5 children report using AI for emotional support. Is this good news or bad? RAND's Ryan McBain discusses: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2854950”

Established AI field signal Resource 19d ago
RAND insurers AI risk report

How Insurers Are Responding to AI Risks

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 2 sources clustered

“AI-related harms are already creating demand for insurance. But they don't fit neatly within existing insurance lines. This new report assesses how insurers are responding—whether through exclusions, endorsements, affirmative coverage, or silence: https://b…”