Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Build my stream Create my edition

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis

1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓

Shared emphasis arxiv.org Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions

Showing signals surfaced by Rebecca Williams ×

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

arxiv.org

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

Ethan Mollick Rebecca Williams

How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.

Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Status quo isn't an option. You can either add additional frictions (adding fees, make services worse, ban agents) or remove them (provide more services with AI help, redesign work to make access easier). Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16603”

Ethan Mollick post ↗

Primary source arxiv.org ↗