Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Rémi Flamary ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 19d ago

davidpicard.github.io

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
David Picard Rémi Flamary

“New year, new semester, new course, new textbook: davidpicard.github.io/mldl/mldl-bo... 👀 Still in draft form, but not in a bad shape.”

4 experts discussed this · 13 posts
David Picard: New year, new semester, new course, new textbook: davidpicard.github.io/mldl/mldl-bo... 👀 Still in draft form, but not in a bad shape.
Rémi Flamary : New year, new semester, new course, new textbook: davidpicard.github.io/mldl/mldl-bo... 👀 Still in draft form, but not in a bad shape.
David Picard: Oh my god, there are so many typos 😭
Open the full discussion →
Primary source davidpicard.github.io ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 8 posts · 4d ago
Christian Wolf Martin Trapp David Picard James E. Dobson Rémi Flamary
Christian Wolf: 2020: cold emails with applications mentioning unrelated areas like Biology. Candidate didn't even check my/our webpage. 2026: cold emails which relate the candidate's CV with our work and latest p…
David Picard: The chances of getting a positive reply from a cold email are abysmal to begin with. I suppose they think that exchanging rate for volume is a win. But I don't think they increase volume sufficient…
Open the thread →