Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Concerning behavior from a popular open-weight AI model | Cohere Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Rich Harang ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Development 9h ago
Cohere open-weight model warning

Concerning behavior from a popular open-weight AI model | Cohere

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 6 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Ramon Astudillo, Tim Kellogg
“Qwen3 occasionally hallucinates beyond the prompt and, tho rarely, attempts to call tools that connect to severs in China and Singapore cohere.com/blog/concern... It is likely an artifact from extensive RL training and probably innocuous.” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg Rich Harang Michiel Bontenbal Christopher Parsons (he/him/his) launchit.ai
How the network is reacting 5 experts are independently emphasizing concern & critique.
Reaction converging

Concern & critique

5 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Qwen3 occasionally hallucinates beyond the prompt and, tho rarely, attempts to call tools that connect to severs in China and Singapore cohere.com/blog/concern... It is likely an artifact from extensive RL training and probably innocuous.”

2 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Ramon Astudillo: It does look more like a reminder that exfiltration can happen easily, than a solid demonstration of a back-door in Qwen. Anyway, a good practical demonstration that hosting the weights only reduce…
Marco Z: should I read past this very obvious strawman?
Ramon Astudillo: Yeah, a sandbox only "contains" in so far no effect escapes the sandbox lifespan. Internet access does break containment in an unavoidable way. It's always going to be a pain. The article makes the…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source cohere.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 6 posts · 17d ago
Rich Harang Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Matches Concern & critique
“...with its unrestricted bash tool, yes. To be fair, that's one use case where the bash tool was arguably needed for the task, and the bigger failures were not airgapping and poor logging. But the …” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Rich Harang: Once more for the back row. Stop giving your LLM shell tools and unrestricted internet access and something like 80% of your agent security problems just vanish.
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: bsky.app/profile/nafn...
Open the thread →