Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by rmoff.net ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 1d ago

Confessions of an Unrepentant Slop Snob

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) charity.wtf rmoff.net

“I wrote a new piece yesterday, called "Confessions of an Unrepentant Slop Snob", about my escalating rage at AI-generated text. It includes a framework for thinking about when AI involvement is fine -- just another tool -- and when it lands as a violation. …”

“This. Every word, of this. @charity.wtf - Confessions of an Unrepentant Slop Snob charity.wtf/p/confession...”

2 experts discussed this · 11 posts
charity.wtf: I wrote a new piece yesterday, called "Confessions of an Unrepentant Slop Snob", about my escalating rage at AI-generated text. It includes a framework for thinking about when AI involvement is fin…
charity.wtf: Because the internet is a hive mind, I have already seen two more excellent pieces today on similar themes. The first is from @terriblesoftware.org, who makes a similar point: "I have my own Claude…
charity.wtf: He also points out that adapting to these tools means we must be MUCH more explicit about what we want & expect. The topic of respecting each other's time (and handling mismatched expectations) is …
Open the full discussion →
Primary source charity.wtf ↗