Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Tom Schaul ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established Policy & governance Analysis 8d ago
⚡ 14 h early
Europe 2031 AI failure risks analysis

Europe 2031 — What getting AI wrong means for us

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Tom Schaul Judith Dada tachikoma Stefanie Hane

“Incredible to see how many people are (still) reading and sharing https://t.co/1pLkJBYk9Y - so we added a few more languages and have many more coming soon! https://t.co/LrWkxP4nBE”

“a new AI 2027 scenario is out but this time focused on Europe. nothing in it is new, but the scenario laid out seems more realistic than the 2027 version because the scope is tighter. the timeline though might be too fast, hard to say.”

Primary source europe2031.ai ↗