Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Shannon Vallor ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 10d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley News

13 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

13 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Hypervisible : 🤷🏿‍♂️
evacide: I cannot overstate how much I have built my entire personality around persisting at hard things, which may help to explain why I find rarely find AI tools to be useful.
Hypervisible : Same! I don’t think I’m overstating things to say part of the project with these tools is to sap our wills.
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Development 4d ago
⚡ 8 h early
Character.ai bankruptcy documents reveal

Character.ai's Bankruptcy Documents Show the Economics of AI Don't Work

9 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

9 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing policy & governance.
Reaction converging

Policy & governance

3 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Character[.]ai financials: - $13.8m on compute a month, then $10m a month - bringing in $2.8m in subscriptions, sometimes less than $1m - revenue from all sources $5.3m a month Its bankruptcy shows the economics of AI don't work: www.404media.co/character-a…”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“The circumstances of CharacterAI’s bankruptcy “are exactly what critics of AI have been saying would happen”— @jasonkoebler.bsky.social They, lit money on fire running its product, did not earn much revenue, & faced huge legal fees after causing harm. Enshi…”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Joseph Cox: Character[.]ai financials: - $13.8m on compute a month, then $10m a month - bringing in $2.8m in subscriptions, sometimes less than $1m - revenue from all sources $5.3m a month Its bankruptcy shows…
SwiftOnSecurity: GenZ has no money to goon
Dr J. Rosenbaum: Character[.]ai financials: - $13.8m on compute a month, then $10m a month - bringing in $2.8m in subscriptions, sometimes less than $1m - revenue from all sources $5.3m a month Its bankruptcy shows…
Open the full discussion →
Established Safety & security Analysis 20d ago
NOEMA AIs not going rogue essay

The AIs Are Not Going Rogue | NOEMA

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

4 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If you need to explain to someone why the ‘Rogue AI’ framing is both wrong and harmful, actually blocking our view of what safety and responsibility requires in AI, this will help:”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

““The important engineering achievement will not be releasing increasingly autonomous artificial coworkers into organizations & hoping they’ve been sufficiently ‘aligned.’ It will be transforming general AI capabilities into controllable & observable workflo…”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Shannon Vallor: If you need to explain to someone why the ‘Rogue AI’ framing is both wrong and harmful, actually blocking our view of what safety and responsibility requires in AI, this will help:
Luke Stark: If you need to explain to someone why the ‘Rogue AI’ framing is both wrong and harmful, actually blocking our view of what safety and responsibility requires in AI, this will help:
Luke Stark: Are you as tired of all this as I am?
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 3 posts · 11d ago
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Chad Topaz Queer DEI Race Traitor: I am working to figure out how serious (if at all serious) the issues that I have in mind are.
Chad Topaz Queer DEI Race Traitor: Many have posted the news story below. I have three responses. (1) I am not a fan of offloading human cognition onto genAI. (2) But I think the research article in question has, *potentially*, some…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 20d ago
Shannon Vallor: Because the discourse is making us all crazy, look upon the face of a dog more blessed than any human, for she has never heard the word superintelligence
Shannon Vallor: woke is when naptime ends and I open the crate. What else could it possibly mean?
Open the thread →