Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Sharon Goldman ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Analysis 6d ago
frontier AI safety governance essay

Who gets a seat at the table to decide if frontier AI is safe?

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Sharon Goldman

“Who gets a seat at the table to decide if frontier AI is safe? Dario Amodei wants independent evaluators to help “pace the frontier.” But the divide between AI safety and cybersecurity complicates a seemingly simple question: Who should do the evaluating? w…”

Primary source groundlevel-ai.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 9d ago

TG-AI-F: The AI doom monsters escape into the mainstream

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Sharon Goldman

“I was absolutely gobsmacked that what I think of as the AI doom monsters had suddenly broken out of AI-land and into the mainstream— to the point that I saw non-AI industry folks I care about sharing scary posts on social media. Things have gotten surreal. …”

Primary source groundlevel-ai.com ↗