Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Shriram Krishnamurthi ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 5d ago
⚡ 201 h early
developers react to AI blog posts report

Report: How Developers React to AI-Scented Blog Posts

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Shriram Krishnamurthi rmoff.net danielroe.dev

“What I'm referring to is pure prose quality. There's a blandness, airiness and vapidity to a lot of AI prose. It's the prose that makes you think "did a human write this?!?" And indeed people don't *want* to read that: writethatblog.substack.com/p/dev-react…”

“How Developers React to AI-Scented Blog Posts writethatblog.substack.com/p/dev-reacti...”

2 experts discussed this · 17 posts
Jason Hartline: Academics have a responsibility to uncover the truth. That requires language that invites scrutiny and signals receptiveness to debate. Pejorative framing is considered harmful.
Jason Hartline: The terms like "AI slop" and "plagiarism machine" ignore progress to the future. Significant effort in academia and from frontier model providers focuses on understanding, mitigating, and removing …
Jason Hartline: The term "plagiarism machine" does not separate the technology from some data sets on which some models were trained. It presupposes that, e.g., plagiarism cannot be technically defined, tested for…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source writethatblog.substack.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 9 posts · 5d ago
Benjamin Riley Shriram Krishnamurthi
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Shriram Krishnamurthi: 8/ Still: it is beautifully written, thoughtful, thought-provoking, broad in scope yet light in heft, and speaks a lot to us in the AI age. I got it one afternoon and read it in essentially one sit…
Shriram Krishnamurthi: 7/ The book's weakness is that it's overly situated in its time, which is not unique nor special. A really interesting companion would be the History of the Future of the Past: How does each genera…
Open the thread →