Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by tweety fish ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 29 posts · 5d ago
Ben Recht tweety fish Isaiah Bishop B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)
Matches Questions & unknowns
“"this machine is as good as humans" okay then why are we still hiring humans? is it cost? dont you guys make 70% margin” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 3
Isaiah Bishop: I dont see a reason to think AGI is impossible, but i do think a lot of people are getting over their skis in part because the anti-AI backlash was pretty dumb
Isaiah Bishop: Like my fundamental view is that AI as it exists, is just the kind of embedded capital we have for machines but for knowledge work. Nothing i have seen from them suggests a really extensive interna…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 28 posts · 3d ago
Dan Hon tweety fish ae
Matches Questions & unknowns
“for good or ill, yep. like for the overwhelming majority of people if they say "should I figure out this stuff?" enh whatever, if you want but there's a lot that's weird. for somebody in software? …” evidence ↗
tweety fish: lol I mean come the fuck on man. Of course it fucking is. If you hate AI enough to avoid any software coded using it—fine! supportable! go with god!—then at least use a fucking modicum of critical …
tweety fish: “Wow this would probably take like a hundred+ hours of work if you weren’t using AI and is super polished and elaborate and was made and released on a lark, not going to think about that any furthe…
Open the thread →