Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Sireesh Gururaja ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 10d ago
⚡ 3 h early
mathematics age of AI

Mathematics in the age of AI

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Mary Branscombe
“trivially easy to verify one proof; how about a few 100? now do the pipeline for getting those from verified to part of the discipline of mathematics, that's the bit we need to work on (in every sphere, not just maths)” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Paper from the essay. Also slides teorth.github.io/tao-web/slid... arxiv.org/abs/2608.16753”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“trivially easy to verify one proof; how about a few 100? now do the pipeline for getting those from verified to part of the discipline of mathematics, that's the bit we need to work on (in every sphere, not just maths)”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 10 posts · 2d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“At this point, time spent on X isn’t potential r/blunderyears content, where a future you will chuckle and ask “What was I even thinking posting there?”” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Maria Antoniak: 1. i get real value from bsky 2. every day i spend here and not on x is a career sacrifice 3. some people are capable of making ethical non-selfish choices 4. powerful people posting on x traps con…
Maria Antoniak: this is my belated contribution to last weekend’s discourse
Open the thread →