Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Sireesh Gururaja ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 10d ago
⚡ 3 h early
mathematics age of AI

Mathematics in the age of AI

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Ramon Astudillo, Sireesh Gururaja, Sung Kim
“Paper from the essay. Also slides teorth.github.io/tao-web/slid... arxiv.org/abs/2608.16753” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Paper from the essay. Also slides teorth.github.io/tao-web/slid... arxiv.org/abs/2608.16753”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“trivially easy to verify one proof; how about a few 100? now do the pipeline for getting those from verified to part of the discipline of mathematics, that's the bit we need to work on (in every sphere, not just maths)”