Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Scott McGrath ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

15 experts · 41 posts · 11d ago
Mike Masnick Scott McGrath Grace Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) jake Dan Hon Doll Alex Rubinsteyn
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Why is that "the problem"? There are many things I can't do without the existence of tools, but having tools have helped me to better understand the underlying concepts.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 2 Policy & governance · 1
Grace: He's upfront with when he uses AI, so you can trust he's upfront with when he doesn't
mackuba.eu: Please just stop…
Open the thread →
7 experts · 28 posts · 19d ago
Ted Underwood Tim Kellogg Scott McGrath Jack Stilgoe Colin John David Pressman nearestnabors.com
Matches Questions & unknowns
“I need to dig into question phrasing here to be confident. But "likely to replace own job" does not seem obviously == to "positive impact on own job"?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Questions & unknowns · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Tim Kellogg: 8 very interesting plots regarding AI sentiment
Tim Kellogg: tbc these are opinions, and while it is a fact that someone had an opinion, an opinion doesn’t necessarily predict the future, even at scale
Open the thread →
3 experts · 13 posts · 3d ago
Anil Dash Scott McGrath Benj Edwards
Matches Questions & unknowns
“I’ll get one of these every couple of days (which is fine, people should use block lists to manage their experiences online), but I always want to ask them: do you know what local models are? What …” evidence ↗
Anil Dash: I’ll get one of these every couple of days (which is fine, people should use block lists to manage their experiences online), but I always want to ask them: do you know what local models are? What …
Anil Dash: I don’t fault anybody for hating big AI and wanting to fight it; I do too. But I don’t think a lot of the folks who do are familiar with data unions, or collectively-owned/created technologies, and…
Open the thread →