Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Sam Power ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 11 posts · 15d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Sam Power: Conceding a priori that I'm relatively thin-skinned, I'm finding it fairly unbearable to read most social media takes about the "Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics". I guess that this could b…
Sam Power: Among other things, it leaves me sad once more that my experience of mathematics on social media was once such an exciting and positive thing.
Open the thread →