Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Chris Stokel-Walker ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 10 posts · 14d ago
Prof. Dr Beth Singler Chris Stokel-Walker VE, cybersocial occult investigator Jeffrey Vagle
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Prof. Dr Beth Singler: I do think anyone who wants us to take Elizer Yudkowsky seriously as an authority on AI armageddon should be forced to testify on video that they have read the entirety of his 660,000 word rational…
Prof. Dr Beth Singler: Agreed. Interviewed him for our BBC Radio 4 40 Years of The Terminator Doc to see whether it influenced current existential risk thinking. Was surprised when he denied he'd ever said we should be w…
Open the thread →