Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,365 searchable experts 2,967 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by suhr ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Developing AI research Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 345 h early
Leiden Declaration AI and mathematics

Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics

14 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

14 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“Do read the whole thing, think about your personal and professional values, and how they can serve as strong grounds for resistance and refusal. leidendeclaration.ai”

“Weeks ago, @chanda.blacksky.app sent me this declaration, written and signed by a bunch of mathematicians. But I only had time to read it yesterday, which ended up being right on time given a new round of hype falling exactly under the patterns this documen…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 6 posts · 16h ago
suhr: I'm somehow reviewing the "neuroscience and cognitive science" track at NeurIPS and it's incredible what bullshit AI/ML researchers can come up with when they read Wikipedia articles about the (sti…
suhr: I fear that if psychology was already in a scientific crisis it will be uncritically torpedoed into whatever becomes of my research field
Open the thread →
2 experts · 12 posts · 2d ago
ae: i like how AI policy think tanks will put out papers like "AGI could drive wages below subsistence level" and then not realize that the obvious implication of their paper is that they broke capital…
SE Gyges: imho, the end of 20th century capitalism is, apparently, also unthinkable; i guarantee you that if more than 50% of the currently working population is no longer working, capitalism as we are famil…
Open the thread →