Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Tech Policy Press ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Policy & governance Development 8h ago
twelve US state companion bot laws

What 12 State ‘Companion Bot’ Laws Demand of AI Providers

4 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“Twelve states now have "companion bot" laws aimed at reducing risks, particularly for minors. Danny Tobey, Ashley Carr, and Michael Atleson of DLA Piper analyze the substantive provisions and identify four overarching principles for AI providers. buff.ly/qt…” evidence ↗
4 experts 1 community 2 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Twelve states now have "companion bot" laws aimed at reducing risks, particularly for minors. Danny Tobey, Ashley Carr, and Michael Atleson of DLA Piper analyze the substantive provisions and identify four overarching principles for AI providers. buff.ly/qt…”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

““Washington’s law goes furthest by requiring providers to prevent chatbots from expressly representing themselves as human to any user, whereas this requirement exists in several other states only for minor users.” techpolicy.press/what-12-stat...”

New Policy & governance Development 5h ago
⚡ 5 h early
Germany AI migration draft law bias

Germany's Draft Law on AI in Migration Raises Rights and Bias Concerns

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“Germany's cabinet approved a bill in July that would allow AI use in visa, residence and asylum procedures. Natalie Welfens, Josefine Flesch and Bernard Quante unpack the rights and bias concerns it raises. buff.ly/SZWJ2GO” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 2 sources clustered

“Germany's cabinet approved a bill in July that would allow AI use in visa, residence and asylum procedures. Natalie Welfens, Josefine Flesch and Bernard Quante unpack the rights and bias concerns it raises. buff.ly/SZWJ2GO”

New Policy & governance Analysis 16h ago
⚡ 11 h early
Germany AI security institute essay

What Germany's AI Security Institute Could Learn From Other Countries

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Justin Hendrix, Tech Policy Press
“AI safety institutes test advanced AI systems to help governments understand their risks. Germany should learn from what has (and hasn’t) worked elsewhere before it builds its own, says Martin Wählisch.” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.
Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“AI safety institutes test advanced AI systems to help governments understand their risks. Germany should learn from what has (and hasn’t) worked elsewhere before it builds its own, says Martin Wählisch.”

New Policy & governance Analysis 16h ago
Germany AI security institute analysis

What Germany's AI Security Institute Could Learn From Other Countries

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“AI safety institutes test advanced AI systems to help governments understand their risks. Germany should learn from what has (and hasn’t) worked elsewhere before it builds its own, says Martin Wählisch. buff.ly/phdY1L6” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“AI safety institutes test advanced AI systems to help governments understand their risks. Germany should learn from what has (and hasn’t) worked elsewhere before it builds its own, says Martin Wählisch. buff.ly/phdY1L6”

Established Policy & governance Analysis 3d ago
⚡ 6 h early
AI criminal liability proposed

Make AI Companies Criminally Liable for Preventable Harm

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Justin Hendrix, Tech Policy Press
“Voluntary blog posts and self-audits aren't accountability, argues Darryl Slabe of ERA Cambridge. He lays out a purpose-built corporate offense for AI harm, modeled on the UK's failure-to-prevent-fraud law, that shifts the burden onto the lab.” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.
Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Voluntary blog posts and self-audits aren't accountability, argues Darryl Slabe of ERA Cambridge. He lays out a purpose-built corporate offense for AI harm, modeled on the UK's failure-to-prevent-fraud law, that shifts the burden onto the lab.”

Established Policy & governance Analysis 3d ago
AI criminal liability essay

Make AI Companies Criminally Liable for Preventable Harm

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“Why not strict liability for AI? Darryl Slabe of ERA Cambridge makes the case for a middle path: a criminal offense a careful lab can defend by proving due diligence, turning a prosecution into "a trial of the safeguards, with evidence, in public." buff.ly/…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Why not strict liability for AI? Darryl Slabe of ERA Cambridge makes the case for a middle path: a criminal offense a careful lab can defend by proving due diligence, turning a prosecution into "a trial of the safeguards, with evidence, in public." buff.ly/…”