Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Daniel Rourke ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 13d ago
⚡ 394 h early
AI as normal technology essay

AI as Normal Technology

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Dustin Moskovitz Daniel Rourke

“Of course, there have been plenty of people along the way who told us we were wrong, whether they were funded or not. Your post is a lot like the well circulated one knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-a... Also, you would be shocked at who is in my personal netw…”

Primary source knightcolumbia.org ↗