Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Policy & governance Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Meta's Muse Is Better at Surveilling Than Helping Me Policy & governance · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Reece ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Meta Muse surveillance critique

Meta's Muse Is Better at Surveilling Than Helping Me

7 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Margaret Mitchell
“A bit from me in @wired.com today wrt our research on AI agents with @evijit.io and Samir Passi. This is a really detailed article, thanks for writing it @thiccreese.bsky.social! www.wired.com/story/metas-...” evidence ↗
7 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Margaret Mitchell Meredith Broussard Eryk Salvaggio Katie Drummond Reece Social Media Lab Jeffrey Vagle
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Meta's new AI agent wanted my passport info. Not to help me. To train on me. Actually, it wanted everything: bank accounts, email inboxes, ID info. No surprise coming from Meta. But always worth reminding readers that AI automations come with major privacy …”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“A bit from me in @wired.com today wrt our research on AI agents with @evijit.io and Samir Passi. This is a really detailed article, thanks for writing it @thiccreese.bsky.social! www.wired.com/story/metas-...”

Primary source wired.com ↗