Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Reece ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Meta Muse surveillance critique

Meta's Muse Is Better at Surveilling Than Helping Me

7 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

7 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Meta's new AI agent wanted my passport info. Not to help me. To train on me. Actually, it wanted everything: bank accounts, email inboxes, ID info. No surprise coming from Meta. But always worth reminding readers that AI automations come with major privacy …”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“A bit from me in @wired.com today wrt our research on AI agents with @evijit.io and Samir Passi. This is a really detailed article, thanks for writing it @thiccreese.bsky.social! www.wired.com/story/metas-...”

New AI field signal Development 22h ago
⚡ 9 h early

Meta’s Muse Is Adults-Only. Why Does It Look Like a Kids’ Toy?

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

““Agents like Muse are trying to convince us they’re just a cute little guy who lives in your pocket, and definitely not an always-open portal into the servers of a major surveillance company,” says @jathansadowski.com. My weekend report for @wired.com: www.…”

Developing Culture, work & education Development 1d ago
KCL survey AI popularity waning

Over 40% of people are limiting AI use, as popularity starts to wane | King's College London

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Gen Z are more likely to use AI regularly, but they also feel AI has more risks than benefits and are more likely to limit their use of it, despite being overwhelmingly confident in their ability to use it: www.kcl.ac.uk/news/over-40...”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Kate Devlin: This. Our recent survey found that 70% of people felt they would find it difficult or impossible to avoid AI even if they wanted to. We cannot meaningfully consent to something that is baked into e…
Kate Devlin: Agreed, although a difference here is that it's being embedded in e.g. operating systems so we don't even get to reject an app. And it's also being used on us more and more, without us having any c…
Reece: This. Our recent survey found that 70% of people felt they would find it difficult or impossible to avoid AI even if they wanted to. We cannot meaningfully consent to something that is baked into e…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 12 posts · 11d ago
Emily M. Bender: Lol -- over on X Nate Silver is apparently holding me up as an example of how "the Left" is anti-AI regulation, and proving his point by posting screen caps of ch 7 of The AI Con, where @alexhanna.…
Emily M. Bender: He screen caps the section called "Enforcing existing regulation" on p.174 and then "Keep the next bubble from growing throug collective action and comedy" on p.195. Here are the section headings f…
Open the thread →