⚡ 202 h early
OpenReview gated paper bot-check
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
2 experts are actively discussing the implications.
1 expert
1 community
1 sources clustered
“That said, assessment of the significance of the work or the depth of insight are things I suspect LLMs will not do well. See also openreview.net/pdf?id=xz1gO... "Position: AI Should Verify, Not Judge, Scientific Work" by Prabhant Singh, et al. and arxiv.or…”
2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Christian Wolf: I can understand your position, but if we forbid AI assistance for reviews then there will not be any conferences anymore in 5 years. Claude + Co may lead to 100k submissions or more for each confe…
Thomas Dietterich: I think this is still a research question. I would like to design an experiment to study it as part of reviews for a future conference.
Thomas Dietterich: That said, assessment of the significance of the work or the depth of insight are things I suspect LLMs will not do well. See also openreview.net/pdf?id=xz1gO... "Position: AI Should Verify, Not Ju…
Open the full discussion →