Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Tim Kellogg ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 6d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

18 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · CJ
“OpenAI is begging for money so they don't release a monster when not releasing a monster is in fact very easy. Their systems can all be turned off (and if they can't, uh?) openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
18 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 21 posts · 2d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Up to Opus 4.6, Claude was *much* better at code switching in real time. I would catch it downshifting after summarizing an article and my first question (one time I asked and it said "Ha! Busted!"…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
Grace: Another possibility is that fable is much better than humans at developing task-specific ontologies / semantic neologisms
Grace: Maybe that’s just broke and bespoke combined? (Besproke?)
Open the thread →
4 experts · 17 posts · 17d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“what is Anthropic’s plan exactly? Sol kicks ass and they’re just going to *take Fable away???*” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: what is Anthropic’s plan exactly? Sol kicks ass and they’re just going to *take Fable away???*
SE Gyges: i am pretty sure everything they had a plan for turned out not to happen and they're just sort of winging it atm
Open the thread →
4 experts · 11 posts · 8d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Why would kimi hosts set their prices based on hosting costs instead of market conditions? The price doesn’t tell us anything about the underlying costs.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: one thing that’s becoming more obvious is that AI labs are not, in fact, fleecing their customers with extraordinarily high prices serving models actually does cost a lot
Michiel Bontenbal: interesting choice for y axis...
Open the thread →
3 experts · 21 posts · 12d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Most models, or most frontier models? I know there are lots of hybrid models, but not ones with performance this high. Does OpenAI/Anthropic even release those details? :p GLM 5.2 doesn't seem to u…” evidence ↗
James MacGlashan: An open model with this performance is great, but perhaps more striking is it looks like it's a hybrid model with 3/4th linear attention and 1/4 standard attention. This kind of performance with a …
Tim Kellogg: no most models have been hybrid for the last, oh probably the whole last year
Open the thread →
4 experts · 8 posts · 8d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“feels like we’re getting around ~1 unsolved math problem per week solved how long until we become numb to this?” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Opportunity & adoption · 3
Tim Kellogg: feels like we’re getting around ~1 unsolved math problem per week solved how long until we become numb to this?
Tim Kellogg: hello, i would like one (1) quantum gravity, thx
Open the thread →
2 experts · 18 posts · 10d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“yo that’s a lot more sophisticated than what i’m getting. how are you getting that? any special tools?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: i think Fable may have massive overhang in 3D printing, curious about Sol
Tim Kellogg: whelp, i have an interlocking piece that it invented, we’ll see
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 3d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“yeah, with Git they already had a mechanism for co-authoring, bc pair programming was a thing — why not just use regular co-authoring?” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Questions & unknowns · 2
Tim Kellogg: these plagiarism machines are getting out of hand
Nikhil Garg: More seriously, academic credit systems need to figure out publication + credit to handle, "ai proved this, probably" and "ai is acknowledged as proving this"
Open the thread →
2 experts · 11 posts · 16d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“i mean, Anthropic is indeed profitable now, so maybe it is?? loss leaders are a thing” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Opportunity & adoption · 2
Tim Kellogg: we talk a lot about model costs, but a huge amount of mindshare is created by people on subscriptions, and subscriptions do not have well-advertised costs call it subsidized, but the true cost look…
Tim Kellogg: it’s coming up because people are finding their openai subs to be gastly short of what they expected and this is kinda within bounds
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 4d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“did you know that Anthropic is currently profitable?” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: with my friends & family back home, i always lead with “oh Ed Zitron? yeah he runs a marketing firm that makes money on anti-AI sentiment” and that usually sets the tone
Matt Darling: I usually talk about what our kids are up to, but that works too.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 3d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“what if we can do better than that though?” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: i would love for Anthropic to do an open weights model, like even if it were a Haiku-class model trained for classifiers, that would be amazing just any breadcrumb at all to not look like a total m…
Tim Kellogg: what if we can do better than that though?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 11d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“China will offer AI systems to (authoritarian) leaders of the global south. “You like your AI models censored? We have them.”” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: i’m kind of split on this one the one hand, i love the message. love open source, democratization, etc. otoh, it’s a very self-serving message for Xi and likely not durable if it doesn’t involve Ch…
Michiel Bontenbal: China will offer AI systems to (authoritarian) leaders of the global south. “You like your AI models censored? We have them.”
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 8d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“no idea, if you’re interested then DM and we can chat??” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: out of curiosity, would anyone pay me to give them career advice? i think i have enough objective evidence that i’m good at it, i just have no idea if there’s even a market there at all
Tim Kellogg: i’m not very good at selling myself, obviously there’s probably a list of like 10 people who i’ve worked with over the years who reliably hmu every time they’re thinking about changing jobs or just…
Open the thread →